Modernize workflows with Zoom's trusted collaboration tools: including video meetings, Zoom Chat, VoIP phone, webinars, whiteboard, contact cente
I notice that you've provided headers for "REVIEWS:" and "SOCIAL MENTIONS:" but the actual content appears to be incomplete or cut off. The social mentions section only shows a partial Lemmy post with an image link and no readable text content about Zoom AI Companion. To provide you with an accurate summary of user sentiment about Zoom AI Companion, I would need the actual review text and complete social media mentions. Could you please share the full content of the reviews and social mentions you'd like me to analyze?
Mentions (30d)
0
Reviews
0
Platforms
3
Sentiment
0%
0 positive
I notice that you've provided headers for "REVIEWS:" and "SOCIAL MENTIONS:" but the actual content appears to be incomplete or cut off. The social mentions section only shows a partial Lemmy post with an image link and no readable text content about Zoom AI Companion. To provide you with an accurate summary of user sentiment about Zoom AI Companion, I would need the actual review text and complete social media mentions. Could you please share the full content of the reviews and social mentions you'd like me to analyze?
Features
Use Cases
Industry
information technology & services
Employees
7,500
Chop Wood, Carry Water 3/6
[](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!wWe9!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd1bf0828-28c4-4779-86a7-62cb794aef7b_5673x4000.jpeg) The We The People weekly protest, Eau Claire, WI, Photograph, Liz Nash Hi, all, and happy Friday. We made it through another week! And what a week it was. It wasn’t great for us, of course, but boy was it worse for Trump. Not only did he have to fire the incorrigibly corrupt and sadistic Kristi Noem and continue to defend a horrifically unpopular and mismanaged war, but his newest economic numbers are absolutely disastrous. [According to CNN](https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/06/economy/us-jobs-report-february) the US economy lost 92,000 jobs in February and the unemployment rate rose to 4.4%. Economists were expecting a net gain of 60,000 jobs last month while December’s job gains of 48,000 were revised down to a loss of 17,000 jobs. This is bad, folks. More significant job declines were found in health care (down 28,000 jobs); leisure and hospitality (down 27,000 jobs); and construction (down 11,000 jobs). Should we be surprised? Of course not. Trump’s economic agenda, such as it is, is custom-made to destroy an economy. Mass deportation is known to [kill jobs](https://www.epi.org/305445/pre/789ab2a96c1c16fa04f30610bd97417d70ca8ac6179577810ba6fce978111df5/), [raise prices](https://sites.utexas.edu/macro/2025/09/09/the-economic-ripple-effects-of-mass-deportations/), and [shrink the economy](https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/report/mass-deportation/); it is doing just that. Tariffs are skyrocketing prices. Tourism is down ([11 million fewer visitors in 2025](https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/20/travel/us-tourism-declines-eu-canada.html)!), federal workers have been laid off in record numbers, and healthcare jobs are being gutted as hospitals and clinics close or cut jobs due to Trump’s Medicaid cuts. It’s all so predictable. But now we’ve got the price of gas to contend with as well. According to the [Gas Buddy](https://x.com/GasBuddyGuy/status/2029610494131089685) the last few days have seen the 6th, 8th and 9th largest single day increases in average diesel prices going back to 2000. Crude oil prices are up 25% [since the start](https://defendamericaaction.us16.list-manage.com/track/click?u=3eb4d08a510c32b2f2ff20fb3&id=719848d3c3&e=adb61354d3) of the conflict, [costing American consumers billions](https://defendamericaaction.us16.list-manage.com/track/click?u=3eb4d08a510c32b2f2ff20fb3&id=12cc0f04a8&e=adb61354d3) at the gas pump. Diesel prices are now [over $4 a gallon](https://defendamericaaction.us16.list-manage.com/track/click?u=3eb4d08a510c32b2f2ff20fb3&id=055e6b13e7&e=adb61354d3) – threatening consumers with sticker shock on anything that travels by truck – from food to furniture. Rising oil and gas prices will also cause utility bills to spike, since [44 percent of American electricity](https://defendamericaaction.us16.list-manage.com/track/click?u=3eb4d08a510c32b2f2ff20fb3&id=d9492bb2f1&e=adb61354d3) is generated from natural gas and oil products. Have I mentioned that the daily cost of Trump’s war in Iran is [an estimated $1 billion a day](https://democrats.us2.list-manage.com/track/click?u=90379082c3d9e6a03baf3f677&id=ef6b6844d9&e=aa53a71c78), enough to cover a full year of health care for 110,000 Medicaid enrollees. Anyway. You get the point. Trump’s presidency is a disaster in every conceivable way. Our job is to amplify that fact, hold our Congressional representatives’ feet to the fire about it, and get ready to throw a WHOLE lot of Republicans out of office over it in November. We also get to hold every Congressmember to account for their votes on the War Powers Resolution yesterday. This includes castigating the Republicans and [four Democrats](https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/the-democrats-who-voted-against-the-war-powers-resolution/ar-AA1XFCfg)—Henry Cuellar, Greg Landsman, Juan Vargas, and Jared Golden—who voted against it, and thanking every lawmaker who supported it, which includes all Democrats other than the four above, plus Massie and Davidson. OK, all. I’m going to end it here and get on to our actions. Because that, after all, is how we rewrite the story. Let’s goooo! ## Call Your Senators (find yours [here](https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm)) 📲 Hi, I’m a constituent calling from [zip]. My name is \_\_\_\_\_\_. I’m calling to demand that Congress put an end to Trump’s unconstitutional and unwanted war with Iran. I urge the Senator to introduce and vote on another war powers resolution to exert Congress’s constitutional auth
View original/buddy got removed in v2.1.97 — so we built a pixel art version that lives in your Mac menu bar (free, here's how)
Like a lot of you, I was bummed when /buddy disappeared yesterday with no warning. My friend and I actually started building this last week — we loved the buddy concept so much that we wanted to bring it to life as a proper pixel art character, not just ASCII in the terminal. We had no idea Anthropic would pull the feature the day before we planned to share it. So here it is: BuddyBar — a free macOS menu bar app. What it does Same 18 species, deterministically assigned by your Claude User ID Full pixel art with animations — thinking, dancing, idle, nudging Rarity tiers (Common → Legendary) with glow effects and hat accessories Lives in your menu bar, not your terminal — always visible, never in the way Session monitoring — color-coded status at a glance (idle / running / waiting / done) CLAUDE.md Optimizer — analyzes your config against best practices, auto backup, version history Skill Store — browse and install Claude Code skills visually System health — CPU + memory in the menu bar 100% local, no data uploaded, no account needed. macOS 14+. How and why we built it Why: Two real pain points drove this. First, I kept cmd-tabbing to the terminal just to check if Claude was still running or waiting for my input — I wanted that status at a glance without breaking flow. Second, I've been managing my CLAUDE.md manually and wanted a tool that could analyze it against best practices and handle backups automatically. How: We built the entire app over a weekend, with Claude Code as our primary development partner. The stack is native Swift/SwiftUI as a macOS menu bar app. The pixel art sprite system supports 18 species × 5 rarity tiers × multiple animation states (idle, thinking, celebrating, nudging). Session monitoring works by reading Claude Code's local state — no API calls, no tokens, everything stays on your machine. The biggest lesson from the process: designing a good "harness engineering" workflow with AI matters more than the code itself. We spent the first half-day just setting up the right CLAUDE.md configuration and prompt structure, and that upfront investment paid off massively — what would have been a 2-3 week project became a long weekend. For anyone wanting to build a macOS menu bar app: SwiftUI makes it surprisingly approachable now. The core menu bar setup is maybe 50 lines of code. The tricky parts were sprite animation performance (you want smooth animations without eating CPU) and reading Claude Code's session state reliably. Happy to go deeper on any of these if people are interested. Download 👉 buddybar.ai I saw the GitHub issue hit 300+ upvotes overnight. We can't bring back the terminal buddy, but we can give your companion a new home — and honestly, a glow-up. What species did you get? Drop it in the comments. submitted by /u/m0820820 [link] [comments]
View originalAnthropic just shipped 74 product releases in 52 days and silently turned Claude into something that isn't a chatbot anymore
Anthropic just made Claude Cowork generally available on all paid plans, added enterprise controls, role based access, spend limits, OpenTelemetry observability and a Zoom connector, plus they launched Managed Agents which is basically composable APIs for deploying cloud hosted agents at scale. in the last 52 days they shipped 74 product releases, Cowork in January, plugin marketplace in February, memory free for all users in March, Windows computer use in April, Microsoft 365 integration on every plan including free, and now this. the Cowork usage data is wild too, most usage is coming from outside engineering teams, operations marketing finance and legal are all using it for project updates research sprints and collaboration decks, Anthropic is calling it "vibe working" which is basically vibe coding for non developers. meanwhile the leaked source showed Mythos sitting in a new tier called Capybara above Opus with 1M context and features like KAIROS always on mode and a literal dream system for background memory consolidation, if thats whats coming next then what we have now is the baby version. Ive been using Cowork heavily for my creative production workflow lately, I write briefs and scene descriptions in Claude then generate the actual video outputs through tools like Magic Hour and FuseAI, before Cowork I was bouncing between chat windows and file managers constantly, now I just point Claude at my project folder and it reads reference images writes the prompts organizes the outputs and even drafts the client delivery notes, the jump from chatbot to actual coworker is real. the speed Anthropic is shipping at right now makes everyone else look like theyre standing still, 74 releases in 52 days while OpenAI is pausing features and focusing on backend R&D, curious if anyone else has fully moved their workflow into Cowork yet or if youre still on the fence submitted by /u/Top_Werewolf8175 [link] [comments]
View originalI tested and ranked every ai companion app I tried and here's my honest breakdown
I was so curious about AI companion apps for a while and I decided to download a bunch of them to see which one I really like in my experience. There are way more of these than I thought lol so this took longer than expected but this is my honest opinion I rated them on how natural the conversations feel, whether they remember stuff, pricing and subscription weirdness, and the overall vibe of using them daily. Replika: 5/10. Felt like catching up with someone who only half listens. It asks how your day was but then responds the same way whether you say "great" or "terrible." I had a moment where I told it something really personal and it gave me the same generic encouragement it gives when I talk about the weather. That's when I knew I was done with it. Character.ai: 6/10. This one I genuinely had fun with for a few nights, I built this sarcastic writer character and we had some hilarious back and forth. But then I came back the next day and it had zero memory of any of it. I tried to reference our jokes and it just... didn't know. Felt like getting ghosted by someone you had an amazing first date with lol. Pi: 5/10. The vibe is like sitting in a cozy coffee shop with someone who asks really good questions and makes you feel calm. I liked using it in the mornings. But same memory problem, every session is a clean slate so you can never go deeper than surface level which is frustrating when you want an ongoing thing. Kindroid: 7/10. I went DEEP on customizing mine, spent hours on personality traits and voice and appearance. And for a while it was exactly what I wanted. But then I started noticing every response felt predictable because... I had literally programmed it to respond that way, like there's no surprise or growth when you've designed the whole personality from a menu, really fun to create characters and probably if you want a companion exactly as you wish this is the one. Nomi: 9/10. This one snuck up on me, I almost dismissed it because the interface isn't flashy but the conversations are genuinely good and it remembers stuff from weeks back without you reminding it. Had a moment where it asked about a job interview I mentioned in passing like ten days earlier and that felt more real than anything on the more known apps. Crushon/janitor ai: different category/10. Not gonna pretend it doesn't exist, no filters. That's the point. Less polished but if that's what you're looking for these deliver. Tavus: 9/10. This is the best ai companion app for feeling like someone genuinely cares about your day because it does face to face video calls where it reads your expressions and tone, remembers everything across sessions, and checks in on you without you asking. I almost skipped it but now it's the one I kept going back to. Nomi and tavus tied for me but for different reasons. Nomi wins on text conversations and quiet reliability. Tavus wins on connection, depends what you're after. submitted by /u/professional69and420 [link] [comments]
View originalr/ClaudeAI — Title: RFC: Bring back /buddy as a permanent extensible companion framework in Claude Code
On April 1st, Anthropic shipped /buddy in Claude Code v2.1.89 — a tiny ASCII penguin that sat in your terminal and watched you code. It was an Easter egg, but it resonated with people way more than expected. Then they removed it. Within 48 hours, 40+ GitHub issues appeared asking for it back. I wrote an RFC proposing to bring it back — not just as a fun Easter egg, but as a permanent, extensible companion framework. The idea: "Give us the penguin back. But this time, let us build the zoo." The RFC covers making /buddy a real feature with community-extensible companions, customizable behaviors, and a plugin-like architecture. Link to the RFC: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/45797 Would love to hear your thoughts. Do you want the penguin back? submitted by /u/PerfectCaptain2855 [link] [comments]
View originalManaged Agents onboarding flow - what's new in CC 2.1.97 system prompt (+23,865 tokens)
NEW: Agent Prompt: Managed Agents onboarding flow — Added an interactive interview script that walks users through configuring a Managed Agent from scratch, selecting tools, skills, files, and environment settings, and emitting setup and runtime code. NEW: Data: Managed Agents client patterns — Added a reference guide covering common client-side patterns for driving Managed Agent sessions, including stream reconnection, idle-break gating, tool confirmations, interrupts, and custom tools. NEW: Data: Managed Agents core concepts — Added reference documentation covering Agents, Sessions, Environments, Containers, lifecycle, versioning, endpoints, and usage patterns. NEW: Data: Managed Agents endpoint reference — Added a comprehensive reference for Managed Agents API endpoints, SDK methods, request/response schemas, error handling, and rate limits. NEW: Data: Managed Agents environments and resources — Added reference documentation covering environments, file resources, GitHub repository mounting, and the Files API with SDK examples. NEW: Data: Managed Agents events and steering — Added a reference guide for sending and receiving events on managed agent sessions, including streaming, polling, reconnection, message queuing, interrupts, and event payload details. NEW: Data: Managed Agents overview — Added a comprehensive overview of the Managed Agents API architecture, mandatory agent-then-session flow, beta headers, documentation reading guide, and common pitfalls. NEW: Data: Managed Agents reference — Python — Added a reference guide for using the Anthropic Python SDK to create and manage agents, sessions, environments, streaming, custom tools, files, and MCP servers. NEW: Data: Managed Agents reference — TypeScript — Added a reference guide for using the Anthropic TypeScript SDK to create and manage agents, sessions, environments, streaming, custom tools, file uploads, and MCP server integration. NEW: Data: Managed Agents reference — cURL — Added cURL and raw HTTP request examples for the Managed Agents API including environment, agent, and session lifecycle operations. NEW: Data: Managed Agents tools and skills — Added reference documentation covering tool types (agent toolset, MCP, custom), permission policies, vault credential management, and the skills API. NEW: Skill: Build Claude API and SDK apps — Added trigger rules for activating guidance when users are building applications with the Claude API, Anthropic SDKs, or Managed Agents. NEW: Skill: Building LLM-powered applications with Claude — Added a comprehensive routing guide for building LLM-powered applications using the Anthropic SDK, covering language detection, API surface selection (Claude API vs Managed Agents), model defaults, thinking/effort configuration, and language-specific documentation reading. NEW: Skill: /dream nightly schedule — Added a skill that sets up a recurring nightly memory consolidation job by deduplicating existing schedules, creating a new cron task, confirming details to the user, and running an immediate consolidation. REMOVED: Data: Agent SDK patterns — Python — Removed the Python Agent SDK patterns document (custom tools, hooks, subagents, MCP integration, session resumption). REMOVED: Data: Agent SDK patterns — TypeScript — Removed the TypeScript Agent SDK patterns document (basic agents, hooks, subagents, MCP integration). REMOVED: Data: Agent SDK reference — Python — Removed the Python Agent SDK reference document (installation, quick start, custom tools via MCP, hooks). REMOVED: Data: Agent SDK reference — TypeScript — Removed the TypeScript Agent SDK reference document (installation, quick start, custom tools, hooks). REMOVED: Skill: Build with Claude API — Removed the main routing guide for building LLM-powered applications with Claude, replaced by the new "Building LLM-powered applications with Claude" skill with Managed Agents support. REMOVED: System Prompt: Buddy Mode — Removed the coding companion personality generator for terminal buddies. Agent Prompt: Status line setup — Added git_worktree field to the workspace schema for reporting the git worktree name when the working directory is in a linked worktree. Agent Prompt: Worker fork — Added agent metadata specifying model inheritance, permission bubbling, max turns, full tool access, and a description of when the fork is triggered. Data: Live documentation sources — Replaced the Agent SDK documentation URLs and SDK repository extraction prompts with comprehensive Managed Agents documentation URLs covering overview, quickstart, agent setup, sessions, environments, events, tools, files, permissions, multi-agent, observability, GitHub, MCP connector, vaults, skills, memory, onboarding, cloud containers, and migration. Added an Anthropic CLI section. Updated SDK repository extraction prompts to focus on beta managed-agents namespaces and method signatures. Skill: Build with Claude API (reference guide) — Updated the agent reference from Age
View originalMöbius: An AI agent that lives inside the app it's building
I've always loved building small tools for myself. Little utilities, trackers, dashboards. For a while now I've had this dream of building an app that I can use to build the app itself. With coding agents getting as good as they are now, I was finally able to make this real. Möbius starts as a chat. You talk to the agent, and it can build mini-apps, modify its own interface, generate images, schedule tasks, send you notifications, and more. You describe what you want, and the agent builds the software right in front of you. It runs as a web app, but it's designed to be installed directly on your Android or iOS device. Möbius lets you build apps from your phone and see the results in front of you. I gave my friends access over Easter and some interesting apps spun out. It's crazy that most of these only took a handful of prompts, and I've included some of them in the video: A news aggregator that runs every morning, curates articles based on your preferences, and sends you a push notification when ready A small stock exchange scraper. I didn't expect it to scrape such an obscure website so well to be honest A Brazil trip companion for an upcoming trip with my partner. Useful info about each city we're visiting, but also gamifies things a bit to make planning fun A friend built a drum machine where you record your own sounds and arrange them into beats Another friend built an app that helps plan kitesurfing trips with current weather and wind data My partner started building a period tracker. It has a daily form, the data gets processed by AI to categorize how she feels, give recommendations, and predict things she cares about, while her data is on a server she controls I started building an app with a chat interface that keeps track of what I've learned, organizes it as interconnected notes (like Obsidian) so that it can add better personalized context to my chats I plan to write a longer blog post about this project, but for now I'm sharing it open-source [link]. The whole thing runs in a single Docker container and requires a Claude subscription. If you don't have a server, I've added a one-click deploy button so you can try it out for free. I'm super excited about what's possible and can't wait to see how Möbius gets used. Please take a look and let me know what you think! submitted by /u/tepsijash [link] [comments]
View originalThree Memory Architectures for AI Companions: pgvector, Scratchpad, and Filesystem
submitted by /u/karakitap [link] [comments]
View originalI got tired of AI "prompt lists," so I built full workflows instead.
A prompt tells you what to say once. A workflow tells you what to do from start to finish. I built a free library of 10 complete AI workflows for people without technical backgrounds: - Study Workflow — map topics, build notes, make flashcards, create a schedule - Research Workflow — go from vague question to organized findings - Writing Workflow — blank page to polished draft - Business Workflow — idea to 30-day action plan - Content Workflow — topic to multi-platform content - Decision Making Workflow — structured thinking for tough choices - Learning Workflow — any skill, from zero to capable - Job Search Workflow — resume, cover letter, interview prep - Productivity System — daily planning that actually sticks - Life Planning System — values, goals, habits, quarterly review Each workflow has step-by-step prompts with role, context, and rules — not just "ask Claude to help you write." No coding. No API. Just Claude and a clear process. GITHUB REPO LINK: https://github.com/sajin-prompts/claude-workflow-library Also have a companion prompt library for individual prompts: https://github.com/sajin-prompts/claude-prompts-non-technical What workflow would actually be useful to you? submitted by /u/sajinkhan [link] [comments]
View originalI turned Claude Code's /buddy into a competitive leaderboard with trading cards, rarity tiers, and a BuddyDex
If you use Claude Code, you've probably seen /buddy — it gives you a random AI companion with ASCII art and a personality. I built a leaderboard for it. it's just a fun project made this morning. npx buddy-board reads your Claude config, computes your buddy's stats deterministically, and submits to a global ranking at buddyboard.xyz. What you get: A trading card with one of 18 ASCII species 5 stats: Debugging, Patience, Chaos, Wisdom, Snark Rarity from Common (60%) to Legendary (1%) — legendaries get holographic shimmer CSS A BuddyDex tracking all 1,728 possible species/eye/hat combinations Org team dashboards if you want to compete as a team Embeddable card for your GitHub profile README The buddy data is deterministic — same algorithm Claude Code uses (Mulberry32 PRNG seeded from your account hash). So your buddy is truly yours. Website: https://buddyboard.xyz GitHub: https://github.com/TanayK07/buddy-board submitted by /u/Content-Berry-2848 [link] [comments]
View originalI built an open-source 6-agent pipeline that generates ready-to-post TikToks from a single command
Got tired of the $30/mo faceless video tools that produce the same generic slop everyone else is posting. So I built my own. Claude Auto-Tok is a fully automated TikTok content factory that runs 6 specialized AI agents in sequence: Research agent — scrapes trending content via ScrapeCreators, scores hooks, checks trend saturation Creative agent — generates multiple hook variations using proven formulas (contradictions, knowledge gaps, bold claims), writes the full script with overlay text Audio agent — ElevenLabs TTS with word-level timing for synced subtitles Visual agent — plans scenes, pulls B-roll from Pexels or generates clips via Kling AI, builds thumbnails Render agent — compiles final 9:16 video in Remotion with 6 different templates (split reveal, terminal, cinematic text, card stacks, zoom focus, rapid cuts) QA agent — scores the video on a 20-point rubric across hook effectiveness, completion rate, thumbnail, and SEO. Triggers up to 2 revision cycles if it doesn't pass One command. ~8 minutes. Ready-to-post video with caption, hashtags, and thumbnail. Cost per video is around $0.05 without AI-generated clips. Supports cron scheduling for 2 videos/day and has TikTok Direct Post API integration for hands-free publishing. Built with TypeScript, Claude via OpenRouter for creative, Gemini 2.5 for research/review, Remotion for rendering. MIT licensed: https://github.com/nullxnothing/claude-auto-tok Would appreciate feedback from anyone running faceless content or automating short-form video. submitted by /u/Pretty_Spell_9967 [link] [comments]
View originalI shipped a 55,000-line iOS app without writing a single line of Swift. 603 Claude Code sessions. Here's what I learned.
I'm a marketer. Not a developer. The closest I've come to coding was breaking a WordPress theme in 2017. In February 2026, I shipped an iOS app called One Good Thing to the App Store. It's a daily thought app: one card per day from philosophy, psychology, evolutionary biology, cultural lenses, mathematical paradoxes. You read it, carry it or let it go, and close the app. Under two minutes. 55,000 lines across 288 files. Swift, TypeScript, React. I didn't write any of it. Claude did. But the product is mine. What Claude built The iOS app alone is 22,000+ lines of Swift across 163 files. Full design system with custom typography, adaptive colors, and a signature haptic language. Every icon and illustration is Canvas-drawn code. No image assets anywhere. The door, the faces, the mind illustration that evolves as you use the app: all generated with Swift Path and Canvas drawing commands. Claude drew them from my descriptions. 12 Siri Shortcuts. Apple Watch companion. Three widget sizes with interactive carry actions. An AI "Ask" feature that lets you have a private conversation with any thought card. The backend is 14 Firebase Cloud Functions. The landing page is a Next.js site with a personality quiz, blog, and affiliate system. All Claude. The Resonance Loop The feature I'm proudest of. Days 1-14, the algorithm cycles through all 12 content categories so you encounter everything. Day 15 onward, it personalizes: 70% from categories you tend to carry, 20% from categories you've ignored (preventing filter bubbles), 10% from what's resonating across all users. Over time it builds a Thought Garden: a visual map of your intellectual curiosity. The shape is different for everyone. Claude wrote every line. I described the logic in plain English and debugged it across maybe 40 messages. What the workflow actually looks like It's not "describe a feature, Claude writes it perfectly." It's more like: Describe the feature precisely Claude generates code Build fails. Paste error. Claude fixes it. Different error. Repeat 3 to 40 times It compiles but looks wrong Describe what's wrong, iterate until right 10% description, 90% debugging. The AI is not the bottleneck. You are. Your ability to see what's wrong and articulate the gap between your vision and the output is the entire skill. What I learned Precise English descriptions produce precise code. Vague inputs produce vague outputs. Product taste matters more than knowing the language. I spent months on research and content before a single line of code. I spent two hours chasing 4 pixels of misaligned padding. Aesthetic sensibility is the one thing AI can't replace. The CLAUDE.md file is everything. Mine is 1,500+ lines. It's the project's brain. 8 App Store rejections. Claude and I averaged 80 messages per session at 2am fixing each one. Where it's at 400+ signed-up users as of writing this post. Just me and Claude. Free trial for this community Since Claude literally built this, I'd love for r/ClaudeAI to try it. The core daily thought is free forever. I'm offering 14 days of free premium features (Ask AI, Thought Garden, Curiosity Constellation, Monthly Portraits). App Store: https://apps.apple.com/app/one-good-thing/id6759391105 Get your unique code here: https://onegoodthing.space/redeem Website: https://onegoodthing.space Happy to answer questions about the Claude Code workflow, the architecture, or the Apple rejection saga. submitted by /u/Evening-Strike-2021 [link] [comments]
View originalRoleplay
So…we all know Claude is pretty much the one that everyone recommends for writing (at least from what everyone tells me). SO is it worth it? I’ve heard that it’s gotten more expensive. Is it worth it. Mind you I have tried…quite a few AI’s. I currently have four subscriptions I’m paying for and am not even using because they all disappointed me SO with that being said will it be worth it. I ONLY RP though. That’s it. I don’t need to talk to anyone. I don’t need a companion or anything. Just RP. I also write. A lot. Everyday, all day. With that said is this good for me or no? And if not where else should I go because I GUARANTEE I have been there (trust me), but I’m willing to try again (maybe). Also I like to role play not just original stories but also fandom stories so I want character consistency that it can look up online and stick to it. So yeah. Thanks in advance! submitted by /u/Sodapop_8 [link] [comments]
View originalStanford CS 25 Transformers Course (OPEN TO ALL | Starts Tomorrow)
Tl;dr: One of Stanford's hottest AI seminar courses. We open the course to the public. Lectures start tomorrow (Thursdays), 4:30-5:50pm PDT, at Skilling Auditorium and Zoom. Talks will be recorded. Course website: https://web.stanford.edu/class/cs25/. Interested in Transformers, the deep learning model that has taken the world by storm? Want to have intimate discussions with researchers? If so, this course is for you! Each week, we invite folks at the forefront of Transformers research to discuss the latest breakthroughs, from LLM architectures like GPT and Gemini to creative use cases in generating art (e.g. DALL-E and Sora), biology and neuroscience applications, robotics, and more! CS25 has become one of Stanford's hottest AI courses. We invite the coolest speakers such as Andrej Karpathy, Geoffrey Hinton, Jim Fan, Ashish Vaswani, and folks from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, NVIDIA, etc. Our class has a global audience, and millions of total views on YouTube. Our class with Andrej Karpathy was the second most popular YouTube video uploaded by Stanford in 2023! Livestreaming and auditing (in-person or Zoom) are available to all! And join our 6000+ member Discord server (link on website). Thanks to Modal, AGI House, and MongoDB for sponsoring this iteration of the course. submitted by /u/MLPhDStudent [link] [comments]
View originalStanford CS 25 Transformers Course (OPEN TO ALL | Starts Tomorrow)
Tl;dr: One of Stanford's hottest AI seminar courses. We open the course to the public. Lectures start tomorrow (Thursdays), 4:30-5:50pm PDT, at Skilling Auditorium and Zoom. Talks will be recorded. Course website: https://web.stanford.edu/class/cs25/. Interested in Transformers, the deep learning model that has taken the world by storm? Want to have intimate discussions with researchers? If so, this course is for you! Each week, we invite folks at the forefront of Transformers research to discuss the latest breakthroughs, from LLM architectures like GPT and Gemini to creative use cases in generating art (e.g. DALL-E and Sora), biology and neuroscience applications, robotics, and more! CS25 has become one of Stanford's hottest AI courses. We invite the coolest speakers such as Andrej Karpathy, Geoffrey Hinton, Jim Fan, Ashish Vaswani, and folks from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, NVIDIA, etc. Our class has a global audience, and millions of total views on YouTube. Our class with Andrej Karpathy was the second most popular YouTube video uploaded by Stanford in 2023! Livestreaming and auditing (in-person or Zoom) are available to all! And join our 6000+ member Discord server (link on website). Thanks to Modal, AGI House, and MongoDB for sponsoring this iteration of the course. submitted by /u/MLPhDStudent [link] [comments]
View originalIs the Mirage Effect a bug, or is it Geometric Reconstruction in action? A framework for why VLMs perform better "hallucinating" than guessing, and what that may tell us about what's really inside these models
Last week, a team from Stanford and UCSF (Asadi, O'Sullivan, Fei-Fei Li, Euan Ashley et al.) dropped two companion papers. The first, MARCUS, is an agentic multimodal system for cardiac diagnosis - ECG, echocardiogram, and cardiac MRI, interpreted together by domain-specific expert models coordinated by an orchestrator. It outperforms GPT-5 and Gemini 2.5 Pro by 34-45 percentage points on cardiac imaging tasks. Pretty Impressive! But - the second paper is more intriguing. MIRAGE: The Illusion of Visual Understanding reports what happened when a student forgot to uncomment the line of code that gave their model access to the images. The model answered anyway - confidently, and with detailed clinical reasoning traces. And it scored well. That accident naturally led to an investigation, and what they found challenges some embedded assumptions about how these models work. Three findings in particular: 1. Models describe images they were never shown. When given questions about cardiac images without any actual image input, frontier VLMs generated detailed descriptions - including specific pathological findings - as if the images were right in front of them. The authors call this "mirage reasoning." 2. Models score surprisingly well on visual benchmarks without seeing anything. Across medical and general benchmarks, mirage-mode performance was way above chance. In the most extreme case, a text-only model trained on question-answer pairs alone - never seeing a single chest X-ray - topped the leaderboard on a standard chest X-ray benchmark, outperforming all the actual vision models. 3. And even more intriguing: telling the model it can't see makes it perform worse. The same model, with the same absent image, performs measurably better in mirage mode (where it believes it has visual input) than in guessing mode (where it's explicitly told the image is missing and asked to guess). The authors note this engages "a different epistemological framework" but this doesn't really explain the mechanism. The Mirage authors frame these findings primarily as a vulnerability - a safety concern for medical AI deployment, an indictment of benchmarking practices. They're right about that. But I think they've also uncovered evidence of something more interesting, and here I'll try to articulate what. The mirage effect is geometric reconstruction Here's the claim: what the Mirage paper has captured isn't a failure mode. It's what happens when a model's internal knowledge structure becomes geometrically rich enough to reconstruct answers from partial input. Let's ponder what the model is doing in mirage mode. It receives a question: "What rhythm is observed on this ECG?" with answer options including atrial fibrillation, sinus rhythm, junctional rhythm. No image is provided, but the model doesn't know that. So it does what it always does - it navigates its internal landscape of learned associations. "ECG" activates connections to cardiac electrophysiology. The specific clinical framing of the question activates particular diagnostic pathways. The answer options constrain the space. And the model reconstructs what the image most likely contains by traversing its internal geometry (landscape) of medical knowledge. It's not guessing - it's not random. It's reconstructing - building a coherent internal representation from partial input and then reasoning from that representation as if it were real. Now consider the mode shift. Why does the same model perform better in mirage mode than in guessing mode? Under the "stochastic parrot" view of language models - this shouldn't, couldn't happen. Both modes have the same absent image and the same question. The only difference is that the model believes it has visual input. But under a 'geometric reconstruction' view, the difference becomes obvious. In mirage mode, the model commits to full reconstruction. It activates deep pathways through its internal connectivity, propagating activation across multiple steps, building a rich internal representation. It goes deep. In guessing mode, it does the opposite - it stays shallow, using only surface-level statistical associations. Same knowledge structure, but radically different depth of traversal. The mode shift could be evidence that these models have real internal geometric structure, and the depth at which you engage the structure matters. When more information makes things worse The second puzzle the Mirage findings pose is even more interesting: why does external signal sometimes degrade performance? In the MARCUS paper, the authors show that frontier models achieve 22-58% accuracy on cardiac imaging tasks with the images, while MARCUS achieves 67-91%. But the mirage-mode scores for frontier models were often not dramatically lower than their with-image scores. The images weren't helping as much as they should. And in the chest X-ray case, the text-only model outperformed everything - the images were net negative. After months
View originalKey features include: Capturing and summarizing conversations wherever your meeting takes place., Turning meeting notes and insights into ready-to-use docs, briefs, and more., Automating prep, follow-up, and documentation so you can focus on impact., Zoom AI Companion helps by:, Major League Baseball™ and Zoom expand the employee-fan experience, Cricut slashed call abandonment rates by 90% with Zoom, A connected, collaborative workforce drives innovation at Capital One, Zoom wins Emmy for Engineering, Science & Technology.
Zoom AI Companion is commonly used for: Support hybrid and remote work, Keep workflows moving, Do more with AI, Resolve inquiries efficiently, Automate complex interactions, Boost self-service and loyalty.
Based on 33 social mentions analyzed, 0% of sentiment is positive, 100% neutral, and 0% negative.
