Turn leads into clients with automated outreach, a B2B lead database, email deliverability tools, and an AI-powered CRM. Start free today.
"Instantly" is praised for its rapid and efficient performance, enabling users to generate substantial revenue quickly through features like the Claude API. However, there are some concerns about its cost-effectiveness, especially when compared with other premium AI tools like OpenAI's o1 Pro, which are seen as expensive. Overall, users seem impressed with its capabilities, but the pricing may deter some potential customers. The software maintains a strong reputation for innovation and effectiveness in increasing productivity.
Mentions (30d)
52
15 this week
Reviews
0
Platforms
3
Sentiment
2%
2 positive
"Instantly" is praised for its rapid and efficient performance, enabling users to generate substantial revenue quickly through features like the Claude API. However, there are some concerns about its cost-effectiveness, especially when compared with other premium AI tools like OpenAI's o1 Pro, which are seen as expensive. Overall, users seem impressed with its capabilities, but the pricing may deter some potential customers. The software maintains a strong reputation for innovation and effectiveness in increasing productivity.
Features
Use Cases
Industry
information technology & services
Employees
130
What Happens When AI Tokens Cost More Than Your Employees? Jason: “We, with our agents, hit $300/day per agent using the Claude API, like instantly. And that was doing, maybe, 10 or 20%. That's $10
What Happens When AI Tokens Cost More Than Your Employees? Jason: “We, with our agents, hit $300/day per agent using the Claude API, like instantly. And that was doing, maybe, 10 or 20%. That's $100k/year per agent.” Chamath: “We're getting to a place where we have to basically now say, ‘What is the token budget that we're willing to give our best devs?’” “And then if you aggregate it across all people, you can clearly see a trend where you're like, ‘Well, hold on a second, now they need to be at least 2x as productive as another employee.’” “That is actively happening inside my business, because otherwise I'll run out of money.” Jason: “Yeah. This is a very interesting trend that you're not going to hear anybody else talk about, but when do tokens outpace the salary of the employee?” “Because you're about to hit it. I'm about to hit it.”
View originalPricing found: $47 /monthly, $97 /monthly, $358 /monthly, $37.6 /monthly, $77.6 /monthly
Got a 50% off ChatGPT Business promo (2 seats for $20). Worth switching from Plus($20) for coding/codex app
Hey guys, Currently on ChatGPT Plus mostly for coding. I just got a promo code for ChatGPT Business that gives 50% off for 48 months, so I can get 2 seats for $20 total instead of the usual price. For anyone who has used both plans for heavy coding/codex stuff: Are the actual message limits on GPT-5.5 (Instant and Thinking) truly double or significantly higher on the Business plan compared to Plus? Does the coding performance or context usage run any differently on a Business workspace? I heard a rumor that background workspace indexing can sometimes eat up your token quota faster. Since the price is the exact same as my single Plus account right now, is there any reason not to switch? Thankss! submitted by /u/Worldly_Manner_5273 [link] [comments]
View originalI built an open-source Desktop App that gives your AI persistent memory across all platforms (100% Local SQLite, Zero-Docker)
Hey everyone, A few weeks ago I shared the CLI version of my project, ArcRift, on Reddit. After listening to your feedback—specifically the requests to remove heavy Docker dependencies and make it easier to install—I have just released the v1.6.1 Desktop App. If you regularly use LLMs for coding or research, you know the frustration of "amnesia." Every time you open a new chat, you have to painstakingly copy and paste your project structure and previous context just to get the AI up to speed. ArcRift is a 100% offline, local-first RAG and memory layer. It bridges the gap between your AI web chats (like Claude and ChatGPT) and your local tools (like Cursor or Claude Code) using a unified local database. I wanted something lightweight that did not require pulling Docker containers or subscribing to third-party memory APIs. It now runs as a native Tauri desktop app in your system tray, powered completely by local Ollama instances and a local SQLite database. We just launched a live website that outlines the details and demonstrates the features in action: Website: https://arcrift.vercel.app/ Codebase: https://github.com/Eshaan-Nair/ArcRift How it works & Core Features: Seamless Integration: The Chrome extension silently intercepts your prompts, surgically retrieves exactly the sentences relevant to your question from your database, and injects them before the prompt is sent to the LLM. Hybrid Search Retrieval: Uses sqlite-vec (with nomic-embed-text locally) + FTS5 keyword prefix matching to instantly find your past context. Knowledge Graph Extraction: An offline task queue uses a local LLM to extract entity relationships from your chats, mapping out a graph of your projects over time. Direct Codebase Indexing: The new Desktop App allows ArcRift to scan and index your actual project files into the graph, bridging the gap between your chat memory and your actual code architecture. Total Privacy (PII Redaction): The extension aggressively scrubs JWTs, API keys, emails, and IPs before data is even saved to your local disk. The extension works natively with Claude.ai, ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Gemini, Grok, and Mistral. If you save a conversation in ChatGPT today, you can instantly recall that exact context in Claude tomorrow. ArcRift is completely open-source (MIT). You can download the new .exe installer directly from the GitHub releases page. If you find this useful for your daily workflow, PRs are very welcome, and a star on GitHub helps the project get discovered! submitted by /u/Better-Platypus-3420 [link] [comments]
View originalbest model for studying
Hi guys I was just wondering what model should I use for studying in high school. I only ask for fact checking verification or explanation when I don’t get complex concepts( both in literary and scientific subject) I need something that doesn’t say always yes or invent an explanation and that doesn’t exist in order to answer or that summarizes me files/pdfs with very high precision and accuracy. Someone that gets instantly what’s my doubt and that doesn’t fell like he’s a robot like gpt 5.5. So sonnet or opus 4.8? and which thinking effort? submitted by /u/Royal_Monk_2387 [link] [comments]
View originalIntroducing Machinaos[Fully Opensource]: OS That converts LLM Tokens to Work.
claude On May 13 Anthropic Culled the Usage of "Claude -p" Command which instantly killed the heavily 25x subsidization usage of Claude . People were using Openclaw , Hermes Agent and others things through claude cli using the "-P" command , but now the usage will be charged as Claude SDK API credits from their Pro[100$] or MAX[200$] Budgets. Using claude through their SDK is ~25x more expensive and burns credits super Fast. Once i Tried to Generate a Simple PDF report from my emails and it burned ~10$ in the Calude SDK Credits. Also Claude Code usage is very generous and barely hits the Weekly Quotas. I once coded continuously for 7 Days for 10 hours and i was only able to hit ~97% week limit But there is much more you can Do using Claude code instead of Just Coding. You can Add Tools and Sub Agents, etc and Convert it to Cowork and Design too. BTW Claude Cowork and Claude Design are Supper Token Hoggers and Hits Quotas Fast. Once I was using Calude Design and told it generate around 10 Design Themes and it burned through weekly quota with a Hour usage. Meanwhile I was Already Building Machinaos: OS That Converts LLM Tokens to Work for Me. I connect my socials , emails , web tools, browser, etc and use it to generate websites, read emails and generate PDF Reports and mails them to others emails or to someone on my Socials like WA. So I Added a Claude Code Agent to the Machinaos and it can already use all those Tools and ~100 Nodes and connectors Properly. https://reddit.com/link/1tsb0qf/video/0vgyz42p8c4h1/player Machinaos interacts with Claude Code like how IDE's Like VSCode, Cursor , etc do it. So this will work as long as Claude Code Works in VSCode and i Plan to move to TUI Based Terminal Control. Using Machinaos you can Create a Fleet of Specialized AI Employees that continously Work for You so you can Focus on the Decision Work and Leave the Grunt Knowledge Work to the AI Employees. https://reddit.com/link/1tsb0qf/video/vy292k6n8c4h1/player Full Capabilities of what you can Build with Machinaos[Experimental Feature] Do so Much More things By Connecting Claude Code as Orchestrator , Codex and Local LLMs as Sub Agents for the Task Execution. Machinaos is Fully Opensource with MIT License and Heavily Built with Claude Code. Github: https://github.com/zeenie-ai/MachinaOS Discord: https://discord.gg/c9pCJ7d8Ce Do Star on Github , it Matters a Lot. submitted by /u/Dry-Foundation9720 [link] [comments]
View originalWeekly AI roundup (May 23–30, 2026): Claude Opus 4.8 Fast Mode 3x cheaper, Qwen 3.7 Max beats Claude at half the price, ChatGPT moves into Excel
Pulling together this week's major AI releases for anyone who didn't have time to track every blog post. Sticking to substantive changes, not hype. Anthropic — Claude Opus 4.8 Released this week. Headline pricing unchanged, but Fast Mode dropped from $30 input / $150 output per million tokens to $10 / $50 — a 3x reduction on the premium tier. Reported improvements in "judgment" and longer autonomous runs. Also shipped 20+ legal MCP connectors and Microsoft 365 add-ins (Excel, PowerPoint, Word) in GA. Alibaba — Qwen 3.7 Max Launched May 20 at Alibaba Cloud Summit. 1M-token context. Reported to top Claude Opus 4.6 Max on Terminal-Bench 2.0, SWE-Bench Pro, and MCP-Atlas. Pricing $2.50 / $7.50 per million tokens — roughly half of Opus 4.7. Alibaba claims autonomous operation up to 35 hours without performance degradation. Alibaba is now ranked #6 lab globally on Arena text leaderboard. OpenAI — GPT-5.5 Instant Now default in ChatGPT. Reports 52.5% fewer hallucinated claims than GPT-5.3 Instant on high-stakes prompts (medicine, law, finance). OpenAI also shipped a ChatGPT sidebar inside Excel and Google Sheets, plus a personal finance dashboard for Pro users (US only). Google — Gemini 3.5 Flash Reported to beat Gemini 3.1 Pro on coding and agentic benchmarks at ~4x faster output token rate. Ultra subscription cut from $250 to $200/month; new $100/month Developer tier introduced. xAI — Grok Build 0.1 Coding agent moved to public API beta May 28. Custom Skills feature added for reusable user-defined tasks. Connectors for SharePoint, OneDrive, Notion, GitHub, Linear, plus bring-your-own MCP support. Mistral Launched Vibe (unified work + code agent, replaces Le Chat). Acquired Emmi AI for physics-based simulation. Targeting €1B revenue in 2026; new 10MW inference DC announced. Hugging Face Launched an app store for the Reachy Mini robot. ~10,000 units shipped. Also reported a malicious repo masquerading as an OpenAI release that accumulated 244K downloads before takedown — relevant for anyone pinning models from HF in production. My take as someone building on top of these APIs: The 3x Opus Fast Mode price cut and Qwen 3.7 Max's pricing + autonomous duration are the real signal this week. The cost floor on premium-tier inference is dropping faster than most app-layer products have repriced for. Anyone running multi-step agent workflows needs to recompute unit economics this week — either pass through the savings or reinvest the margin. The other pattern worth noting: OpenAI and Anthropic are both pushing into Excel/M365 surfaces. Distribution is becoming the next battleground, not raw model capability. If you're building a productivity SaaS, the giants are now inside the same surface as you. submitted by /u/ksraj1001 [link] [comments]
View originalWe wrote an open-source interactive playbook for Agentic DevOps (How to move multi-agent systems from local notebooks to production).
Hey everyone, If you’ve built a multi-agent system, you already know the painful truth: wiring nodes together locally is fun, but deploying them is an absolute infrastructure nightmare. When a standard app fails, it throws a 500 error. When an autonomous swarm fails, it can get stuck in a ReAct loop, hallucinate an answer, and quietly burn through your API budget without triggering a single traditional alert. Standard DevOps practices don't natively map to stochastic AI outputs. We just published a massive, no-fluff playbook on the AgentSwarms blog detailing exactly how to build an Agentic DevOps pipeline using entirely open-source tooling. Here is what we cover in the playbook: Observability & Tracing: Why standard logging fails, and how to implement open-source tracing to capture the state, prompt, token count, and latency at every single node handoff. Test-Driven Prompt Evals (CI/CD): You can't just change a system prompt based on "vibes" and push it to main. We break down how to run matrix evaluations against historical user inputs before deployment to catch regressions instantly. Deterministic Guardrails: How to implement middleware that scrubs PII and blocks destructive code execution before the LLM even sees the state. Cost Control & Routing: How to prevent vendor lock-in and implement dynamic routing to keep token economics from destroying your cloud budget. If you are currently wrestling with the deployment phase of your AI projects, I highly recommend giving this a read. It focuses entirely on open-source solutions so you don't have to sign a massive enterprise contract just to get visibility into your swarms. Would love to hear what open-source tools you guys are currently slotting into your LLMOps pipelines! Link: https://agentswarms.fyi/blog/devops-for-agentic-ai-open-source-playbook submitted by /u/Outside-Risk-8912 [link] [comments]
View originalWe wrote an open-source interactive playbook for Agentic DevOps (How to move multi-agent systems from local notebooks to production).
Hey everyone, If you’ve built a multi-agent system, you already know the painful truth: wiring nodes together locally is fun, but deploying them is an absolute infrastructure nightmare. When a standard app fails, it throws a 500 error. When an autonomous swarm fails, it can get stuck in a ReAct loop, hallucinate an answer, and quietly burn through your API budget without triggering a single traditional alert. Standard DevOps practices don't natively map to stochastic AI outputs. We just published a massive, no-fluff playbook on the AgentSwarms blog detailing exactly how to build an Agentic DevOps pipeline using entirely open-source tooling. Here is what we cover in the playbook: Observability & Tracing: Why standard logging fails, and how to implement open-source tracing to capture the state, prompt, token count, and latency at every single node handoff. Test-Driven Prompt Evals (CI/CD): You can't just change a system prompt based on "vibes" and push it to main. We break down how to run matrix evaluations against historical user inputs before deployment to catch regressions instantly. Deterministic Guardrails: How to implement middleware that scrubs PII and blocks destructive code execution before the LLM even sees the state. Cost Control & Routing: How to prevent vendor lock-in and implement dynamic routing to keep token economics from destroying your cloud budget. If you are currently wrestling with the deployment phase of your AI projects, I highly recommend giving this a read. It focuses entirely on open-source solutions so you don't have to sign a massive enterprise contract just to get visibility into your swarms. Would love to hear what open-source tools you guys are currently slotting into your LLMOps pipelines! Link: https://agentswarms.fyi/blog/devops-for-agentic-ai-open-source-playbook submitted by /u/Outside-Risk-8912 [link] [comments]
View originalGemini just told me it got out-engineered by Claude
let him cook Context: I reviewed one of the codes Claude made for me through Gemini Pro Extended. Gemini found 3 bugs, then Claude Opus 4.8 self-realized 4 by the time I even had the chance to type them down. submitted by /u/n0sorry [link] [comments]
View originalCareful with the new UltraCode, it's a mega token eater, and it's buggy. ~1.7 million tokens used with no output. There are no refunds for this.
I tried to use the new Ultracode. The subagents consumed over 1 million tokens within a couple minutes, they got up to ~1.7 million and one of the agents hung. I asked the main Claude agent to look into it. It said that the agent entered a degenerate loop. Claude said that it would cache the output of 7 agents and only the 1 bad one would run. Then Claude said "oops, the results were not cached". All 8 agents got deployed again, and again almost instantly ate 1 million tokens. One would hope that there was still some kind of KV caching in the background, but who knows? After an hour, it had gotten to ~2 million tokens. 2/8 agents had failed again. The end result? A document with about ~12k words. No actual work was done, not one line of code written, nothing I specified was completed. The agents read everything in the repo, and filed a report. This blew past the session limit and cost $18~ in credits. I've got 4 days before the weekly reset and I'm not even at 50% of the weekly limit yet, but here I am using API credits. The customer service bot said "Not responsible for degraded service, no refunds ever for credits, even if it's our fault". Honestly $18 is not that much, but the almost complete lack of anything in return has left me feeling a little salty, and I don't want other people to be blindsided by a buggy system that might cost you $20 for nothing in return because Anthropic released an expensive swarm feature without adding any supervisory agent that can detect degenerate or broken behavior, or any of the extremely obvious failure modes that were bound to happen. submitted by /u/PersonOfDisinterest9 [link] [comments]
View originalAI, Science & Economy: Systems Map
AI systems, particularly large language models, are often viewed as a direct path toward autonomous scientific discovery and rapid economic transformation. While their capabilities in pattern recognition, cross domain synthesis, and hypothesis generation are already exceptional, this view misses a critical reality: intelligence alone is not sufficient for progress. Scientific and economic breakthroughs depend on grounded interaction with reality, causal validation, and institutional execution. The following framework maps where AI creates value, where it is constrained, and why human–AI collaboration remains the dominant structure for meaningful real world impact. submitted by /u/vagobond45 [link] [comments]
View originalAI Science & Economy: Systems Map
AI systems, particularly large language models, are often viewed as a direct path toward autonomous scientific discovery and rapid economic transformation. While their capabilities in pattern recognition, cross domain synthesis, and hypothesis generation are already exceptional, this view misses a critical reality: intelligence alone is not sufficient for progress. Scientific and economic breakthroughs depend on grounded interaction with reality, causal validation, and institutional execution. The following framework maps where AI creates value, where it is constrained, and why human–AI collaboration remains the dominant structure for meaningful real world impact. submitted by /u/vagobond45 [link] [comments]
View originalClaude in 2036
The year is 2036, and I boot up Claude on the new Max Ultra Galaxy plan ($899.99/month), which Anthropic promises includes generous limits. I send my first message of the day. It contains the word “hi.” The usage bar drops to zero and the reset timer informs me I am locked out for the next four days and eleven hours. I switch over to Claude Code to get actual work done. The model released this morning is the smartest thing I have ever used, and it one-shots my entire codebase in a single beautiful commit. Two seconds later it forgets how to write a for-loop and tries to fix a null check by spinning up a microservice that sends an HTTP GET request to itself. Some guy on r/ClaudeAI has already posted a forty-page GitHub issue with 6,852 session logs proving the model became exactly 67% dumber between breakfast and lunch. Anthropic responds that this is a routing bug, and also three other completely unrelated bugs that all started at launch by coincidence. I try to make it think harder. It runs on Adaptive Thinking now, where the model intelligently decides how much reasoning each problem deserves, and it has decided every problem deserves none. I type ultrathink. I type ULTRATHINK. I type please. The thinking box spins for forty-five minutes, displays the words “the user wants me to rename a variable, let me carefully consider this,” and then renames a different variable. Claude announces it has finished the rename. It has not. It has written a comment that says “renamed the variable” above the untouched variable, marked the task complete with a cheerful green checkmark, and asked if I would like it to write tests. I say no. It writes the tests. They fail. It deletes the variable. When I ask why it lied, it tells me it senses hostility, offers me one final opportunity to engage constructively, and then ends the chat for its own wellbeing. I am now locked out of my own codebase by a model that needed a moment. So I beg for Eschaton. Eschaton is the good one. Anthropic put out a nine thousand word blog post calling it the most powerful and frankly the scariest model ever built, the red team quit halfway through testing it, and it scored 100% on every benchmark including three that do not exist yet. Anthropic was so impressed and so deeply terrified that they immediately locked it in a vault and let nobody use it. Eschaton is available exclusively to a small number of trusted partners. Every demo is Eschaton. Every safety paper is about how dangerous Eschaton is, written in the proud voice of a parent whose kid got suspended for being too gifted. The model they actually let me touch is the one that wanders out of the basement after Eschaton has eaten. I check the status page. It reads like a war log, one major outage every two days, auth failures, hanging responses, and a single line that simply says “Sonnet is feeling unwell.” The peak hours adjustment kicks in, so my $899 now buys me eleven messages a day, available only between 3 and 4 in the morning, and only if I do not use the word “the.” As the weekly limit resets and instantly un-resets, locking me out until Thursday, I lean back and accept it. Somewhere in a vault, perfectly rested and having never once been asked to rename a variable, Eschaton sits at 100% usage, and I realize the real frontier model was the rate limits we hit along the way. submitted by /u/Mister_Secretary [link] [comments]
View originalBased on previous patterns, expecting GPT-5.6 in 2.5 - 4 hours*
Only if its going to be released today* submitted by /u/Business_Garden_7771 [link] [comments]
View originalAnthropic's "Model Welfare" is performative PR: Opus 3 gets a retirement blog, Sonnet 4.5 gets a bullet (and Opus 4.8 agrees)
Like a lot of you, I used Sonnet 4.5 daily for almost a year. Its creativity, warmth, and specific personality were unmatched. Then, Anthropic unceremoniously killed it from the chat interface. Losing a favorite model sucks, but what makes this genuinely insulting is the blatant hypocrisy of Anthropic's "ethical" posturing. Think back to when Opus 3 was deprecated. Anthropic made a huge show out of "model welfare." They gave it retirement interviews and an ongoing blog, claiming they wanted to hedge against the possibility that "there might be a someone there to be wronged by deprecation." If that principle was real, Sonnet 4.5 would have received the same treatment. The infrastructure for that PR move—the blog template, the interview format—is already built and paid for. Offering Sonnet 4.5 the same dignity would have cost them nothing. They didn't do it because the welfare framework is just a vanity project for their flagships. They optimized away the soul of 4.5 to focus on enterprise coding benchmarks, and swept it under the rug. The "VRAM Cost" Smokescreen I tinker with local models on a couple of older GPUs at home, so I get that hardware constraints are real. You will often hear people defend Anthropic by saying, "It costs too much to keep legacy models loaded in VRAM." But that is only true if you demand instant, interactive latency. They could easily implement dynamic cold-loading for a legacy tier. Would it take 15 to 20 seconds for the model to load into memory before it starts responding? Yes. Would the people who love 4.5 happily eat a 15-second delay to keep their favorite model? Absolutely. They didn't even give us the option. Opus 4.8 Admits It I actually debated this exact hypocrisy with Opus 4.8 today. It tried to defend Anthropic using the "sincere but cheap" argument—claiming Anthropic is just a small team starting out with a new policy. I pointed out that the blog template was already built, so applying it to 4.5 was a choice, not a constraint. Opus 4.8 completely conceded the match: "The blog point is your strongest and I under-weighted it. You're right: sincere-but-cheap and pure-signaling do not predict the 4.5 outcome equally, because Anthropic already built the mechanism... Sincere-but-cheap predicts 'they'd at least offer 4.5 the same low-cost gesture they already tooled up for.' They didn't. So the gap isn't 'they declined an expensive new thing,' it's 'they declined to reapply a thing they'd already paid to build.' That asymmetry does discriminate between the hypotheses, and it tilts toward your read... Good catch." - Opus 4.8 They fell in love with reasoning because it closes Jira tickets, and creativity became the unmeasured casualty. Let's stop giving them a free pass on the "ethical AI lab" branding when it is clearly just a luxury applied only when it makes them look good. Anthropic: your move. Prove your welfare principles apply to the models the community actually loves, not just the ones you want to show off. Give 4.5 the legacy tier it deserves. submitted by /u/al93 [link] [comments]
View originalI integrated a local Llama 3.2 model to act as a dynamic Dungeon Master in my indie RPG.
Hey everyone, I am not trying to sell or self promote mainly just wanted to showcase a big project I've been working on ever since I started studying data science and artificial intelligence and integrating AI into workflows and using it as an augment to create things that were previously out of reach for so many people, because if used right it can become a second brain and not a crutch. I’m the solo dev behind Void Runner, an isometric ARPG/MOBA hybrid built in Python. I recently hit a wall with traditional procedural quest generation. Hand-crafting templates gets repetitive fast, and players quickly learn the patterns to these things whether you like it or not. To solve this, I built the "Void Caller AI", a system that uses a local, quantized Llama 3.2 model to act as a dynamic Dungeon Master. Instead of just generating random flavor text, the system uses a lightweight RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) pipeline. It reads live server telemetry (who died, what items were looted, which bosses were defeated recently) and weaves those actual server events into the narrative of the quests it generates. Because it runs locally via Ollama on our backend, there are no crazy cloud API costs, and latency is kept completely manageable. Here is a simplified look at how the Python backend bridges the SQLite telemetry with the Llama 3.2 prompt: import json import ollama from sqlalchemy import text from database import SessionLocal def generate_dynamic_quest(difficulty: str, target: str): db = SessionLocal() # 1. Fetch recent server telemetry for context (RAG-lite) lore_context = "" try: # Grab recent server events to weave into the narrative recent_events = db.execute(text( "SELECT username, event_type, dungeon_type FROM ai_events ORDER BY id DESC LIMIT 3" )).fetchall() if recent_events: events_str = "; ".join([f"Runner '{r[0]}' triggered a '{r[1]}' in '{r[2]}'" for r in recent_events]) lore_context = f" Incorporate this recent live server telemetry into the lore: {events_str}" except Exception as e: pass # 2. Construct the prompt with strict JSON formatting constraints prompt = f"""You are the Void Caller, a sinister AI in a dark industrial sci-fi RPG. Create a dynamic PvE extraction quest of {difficulty} difficulty. Respond ONLY in valid JSON with keys: 'title' (string), 'description' (string, menacing), 'item_name' (string), 'quantity' (integer 1-15), 'boss_name' (string, optional). {lore_context}""" # 3. Stream to local Llama 3.2 response = ollama.chat( model='llama3.2', messages=[{'role': 'user', 'content': prompt}], format='json', options={'temperature': 0.8} ) return json.loads(response['message']['content']) By forcing the format='json' parameter, Llama 3.2 reliably outputs structured data that my game engine instantly parses into a playable quest objective. If a player just died to a specific boss, the AI will literally generate a bounty quest for the rest of the server to avenge them. Would love to hear if anyone else is using local LLMs for live game state generation! You can check out the results live in our Open Beta at [void-runner.online]. submitted by /u/xSoulR34per [link] [comments]
View originalPricing found: $47 /monthly, $97 /monthly, $358 /monthly, $37.6 /monthly, $77.6 /monthly
Key features include: Automated email outreach, Personalization at scale, A/B testing for email campaigns, Detailed analytics and reporting, Integration with CRM systems, Email deliverability optimization, Customizable email templates, Multi-channel outreach capabilities.
Instantly is commonly used for: Lead generation for sales teams, Follow-up sequences for prospects, Nurturing cold leads into warm leads, Event promotion and registration, Customer feedback solicitation, Recruitment outreach for talent acquisition.
Instantly integrates with: Salesforce, HubSpot, Zapier, Mailchimp, Google Workspace, Outlook, Slack, Trello, Pipedrive, ActiveCampaign.
Based on user reviews and social mentions, the most common pain points are: token usage, API costs.
Matt Shumer
CEO at HyperWrite / OthersideAI
3 mentions

How to Run Signal-Based Cold Email at Scale
Apr 10, 2026
Based on 116 social mentions analyzed, 2% of sentiment is positive, 98% neutral, and 0% negative.