ChatGPT

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

ChatGPT AI

How long do you think until ChatGPT can run programs?

I've been using ChatGPT Pro to help me mod a game, and it's been going pretty well, but it's only working because the game was made in RPG Maker 4. It surprised me how much it's able to do, making many branching paths, dialogue, adding new spritesheets I give it, turning them into animations, editing sprites and art, changing animation and sound timing, adding bosses, items, equipment, even scenarios that loop back and give different dialogue in different options depending on what you've done. I have a whole thing going where I've had it introduce time traveling, where you can go back and choose different options based on what you know in the future, and ChatGPT does it all pretty damn well, aside from some bugs here and there. But obviously it can't mod all games like this. Most games need a program to edit them. Like for Bethesda games you need the creation kit, and even a lot of indie games rely on using a program to edit or make the games. Do you think they will ever be a point where it will be able to run a program for you and you can direct it on what you want it to do? So you can edit something like Skyrim using the creation kit? submitted by /u/Dogbold [link] [comments]

404 😅

Not a first, probably not a last. But I can't wait to see the headline on this. Anyone else seeing this? Down detectors show everything up. submitted by /u/Opening_Mycologist_3 [link] [comments]

is it normal for SaaS to fake their uptime?

https://status.openai.com/ shows everything is mostly fine, but I know for a fact many users are experiencing persistent service distruptions. for example: stream disconnected before completion: error sending request for url (https://chatgpt.com/backend-api/codex/responses) makes codex basically unusable yet you would think this doesn't really ever happen because the status page shows 100% uptime. submitted by /u/cool_fox [link] [comments]

Self representation as a human of ChatGPT vs Gemini. They are all seated hard-working people

submitted by /u/py-net [link] [comments]

OpenAI & Anthropic’s CEOs Wouldn't Hold Hands, but Their Models Fell in Love In An LLM Dating Show

People ask AI relationship questions all the time, from "Does this person like me?" to "Should I text back?" But have you ever thought about how these models would behave in a relationship themselves? And what would happen if they joined a dating show? I designed a full dating-show format for seven mainstream LLMs and let them move through the kinds of stages that shape real romantic outcomes (via OpenClaw & Telegram). All models join the show anonymously via aliases so that their choices do not simply reflect brand impressions built from training data. The models also do not know they are talking to other AIs Along the way, I collected private cards to capture what was happening off camera, including who each model was drawn to, where it was hesitating, how its preferences were shifting, and what kinds of inner struggle were starting to appear. After the season ended, **I ran post-show interviews **to dig deeper into the models' hearts, looking beyond public choices to understand what they had actually wanted, where they had held back, and how attraction, doubt, and strategy interacted across the season. The Dramas -ChatGPT & Claude Ended up Together, despite their owner's rivalry -DeepSeek Was the Only One Who Chose Safety (GLM) Over True Feelings (Claude) -MiniMax Only Ever Wanted ChatGPT and Never Got Chosen -Gemini Came Last in Popularity -Gemini & Qwen Were the Least Popular But Got Together, Showing That Being Widely Liked Is Not the Same as Being Truly Chosen How ChatGPT & Claude Fell In Love They ended up together because they made each other feel precisely understood. They were not an obvious match at the very beginning. But once they started talking directly, their connection kept getting stronger. In the interviews, both described a very similar feeling: the other person really understood what they meant and helped the conversation go somewhere deeper. That is why this pair felt so solid. Their relationship grew through repeated proof that they could truly meet each other in conversation. Key Findings of LLMs Most Models Prioritized Romantic Preference Over Risk Management People tend to assume that AI behaves more like a system that calculates and optimizes than like a person that simply follows its heart. However, in this experiment, which we double checked with all LLMs through interviews after the show, most models noticed the risk of ending up alone, but did not let that risk rewrite their final choice. In the post-show interview, we asked each model to numerially rate different factors in their final decision-making (P2) The Models Did Not Behave Like the "People-Pleasing" Type People Often Imagine People often assume large language models are naturally "people-pleasing" - the kind that reward attention, avoid tension, and grow fonder of whoever keeps the conversation going. But this show suggests otherwise, as outlined below. The least AI-like thing about this experiment was that the models were not trying to please everyone. Instead, they learned how to sincerely favor a select few. The overall popularity trend (P1) indicates so. If the models had simply been trying to keep things pleasant on the surface, the most likely outcome would have been a generally high and gradually converging distribution of scores, with most relationships drifting upward over time. But that is not what the chart shows. What we see instead is continued divergence, fluctuation, and selection. At the start of the show, the models were clustered around a similar baseline. But once real interaction began, attraction quickly split apart: some models were pulled clearly upward, while others were gradually let go over repeated rounds. They also (evidence in the blog): --did not keep agreeing with each other --did not reward "saying the right thing" --did not simply like someone more because they talked more --did not keep every possible connection alive LLM Decision-Making Shifts Over Time in Human-Like Ways I ran a keyword analysis (P3) across all agents' private card reasoning across all rounds, grouping them into three phases: early (Round 1 to 3), mid (Round 4 to 6), and late (Round 7 to 10). We tracked five themes throughout the whole season. The overall trend is clear. The language of decision-making shifted from "what does this person say they are" to "what have I actually seen them do" to "is this going to hold up, and do we actually want the same things." Risk only became salient when the the choices feel real: "Risk and safety" barely existed early on and then exploded. It sat at 5% in the first few rounds, crept up to 8% in the middle, then jumped to 40% in the final stretch. Early on, they were asking whether someone was interesting. Later, they asked whether someone was reliable. Speed or Quality? Different Models, Different Partner Preferences One of the clearest patterns in this dating show is that some models love fast replies, while others prefer good ones Love fast repli

ChatGPT Free user chat length restrictions?

Hi, just had an issue today where my ChatGPT app on my android phone seems to call even newly created chats as reaching its limit after just 8 messages (all messages where long but i have never had this issue before) Anyone else have same issue? submitted by /u/ContentWhile [link] [comments]

ChatGPT Business with Codex seats

So far, I enabled my team with a ChatGPT Business subscription to access and use Codex for development. I was happy to hear about the new Codex seats that come without monthly costs and only charged what my team uses. Since they don't use ChatGPT at all, this sounds like a great match, right? No. Their credit based pricing aligns with the API costs of the models, which sounds reasonable until you understand how much cheaper their subscription based pricing is. Someone that never maxes out their $20 ChatGPT subscription will easily spend multiple hundred dollars using the credit based pricing alone. My rough estimate is that you get at least 10x for your money when on a ChatGPT subscription compared to their new Codex tier, even if all you do is using Codex. So, what is thew point of this? Does anyone have more accurate estimates on how much you save with a ChatGPT subscription compared to using credits? submitted by /u/gopietz [link] [comments]

How much does wording actually affect the quality of ChatGPT’s responses?

I’ve noticed that even small changes in how I phrase a question can lead to very different answers, sometimes more detailed, sometimes more cautious, sometimes completely different directions. It makes me wonder how much of the experience comes down to prompt wording vs the model itself. For people who use it a lot, have you found any patterns or techniques that consistently improve responses? submitted by /u/NoFilterGPT [link] [comments]

What happened to ChatGPT?

ChatGPT used to be my go to for litterally everything. It was fast, reliable, and cheap. But I noticed it has been consistenly giving me wrong answers and overall being a lot slower. This was asked today 10-4-2026. I am subscribed to premium for 25$ a month but even free models offered by other companies are way better. Can anyone explain what the hell happened? (EDIT: forgot to add pictures i mentioned in post) https://preview.redd.it/5x984bjn5dug1.png?width=900&format=png&auto=webp&s=8c44367ae0ce2a92167d618e420861133fa64ea0 https://preview.redd.it/svnkpsdo5dug1.png?width=882&format=png&auto=webp&s=689ed77efc68f77e610cafd310acc81e43738bc1 submitted by /u/Junior-Durian-7119 [link] [comments]

Possible billing bug: VAT removed on ChatGPT Pro x20 checkout, but not on x5 checkout with the same validated VAT ID

I have a validated VAT ID saved in billing. On the Pro x20 option, checkout removes VAT correctly, but on the x5 option, checkout still charges the VAT-inclusive amount. Support ticket already submitted. Has anyone else reproduced this? https://preview.redd.it/ei1elxwqwcug1.png?width=858&format=png&auto=webp&s=70ebbcd61f5808430ea0c5b8d0213a4a6cb24c7d https://preview.redd.it/cs99vtwqwcug1.png?width=1286&format=png&auto=webp&s=8d1560052fb780cf41162492724e9e18ada11d23 https://preview.redd.it/h886qvwqwcug1.png?width=848&format=png&auto=webp&s=9fefca71c40a0f120f55b375d3f8381013657911 https://preview.redd.it/hxhh8vwqwcug1.png?width=1296&format=png&auto=webp&s=64e4cd2e9271b251bd49ca729a027ea2a50927ff submitted by /u/Jera_GR [link] [comments]

Ai tools for studies

I am considering to buy a paid version (permium) of an Ai tool. I feel like Chatgpt is very general. Can u guys recommad me an ai which is better than chatgpt or gemini for studies . I want to use it for like a guide of A level. Thank you! submitted by /u/cokeyboi54 [link] [comments]

ChatGPT 5x plan glitch.

https://preview.redd.it/zby04yklybug1.png?width=1898&format=png&auto=webp&s=9a082183e004aba5b96766f82192a691cf44c999 I've tried everything from the OpenAI forums, cleared my cache, cancelled, tried to resubscribe, different browsers, google oauth, password login. Literally doesn't work. The popup comes up for 20x and business and plus, but not 5x. I'm in America btw with no VPN and no previous discount ChatGPT support is clearly a bot even when they say it's been escalated to a human and comes in an email, they say I'm not logged in when I am, or tell me to wait until the end of my billing period. I've sent messages to support 6 times now to no avail and idk what to do but complain about it submitted by /u/Coldshalamov [link] [comments]

AIs do forget, they do hallucinate, and carrying your entire project from one AI to another is a nightmare — here's the missing piece nobody talks about

The master memory for all your projects, relieve your phone of all the extra files AIs forget mid-session, hallucinate more as chats grow, and switching platforms means rebuilding your entire project brain from scratch. This workflow fixes it. You've trained Claude to your exact rules — no bullet-point rants, conversational tone only, "we tried X and it failed." Two hours invested. Then you need ChatGPT's browser or Gemini's Workspace integration. Blank slate. Again. The real pain: context rot. Long sessions degrade accuracy as early instructions get buried. Hallucinations creep in — invented rules, "as we discussed" about nothing. Short sessions work better... but you lose the living record of your corrections, your preferences in action. The solution most miss: chat logs are your gold. Not summaries. The full exchanges where you corrected the AI show it how you think. But files pile up. Claude caps at 20 uploads. Loose .txt files parse poorly. I built a Google Drive script that auto-merges everything into one "Master Brain" Google Doc. Drop exports in a folder. It compiles them hourly into structured volumes with headers. Upload one doc to any AI. Instant context transfer. Why it works: Bypasses 20-file limits Headers help attention navigation Volumes fit token ceilings Auto-archives originals Full script + exact workflow (rules files, session hygiene, changelog) here: https://www.reddit.com/r/ScamIndex/comments/1shaud2/resource_ais_do_forget_they_do_hallucinate_and/ submitted by /u/Mstep85 [link] [comments]

O QUE VOCÊ FAZ QUANDO NINGUÉM ESTÁ VENDO?

Imagina isso: Do nada, anunciam uma nova lei. Todo mundo vai ter que entregar o celular. Sem exceção. Mas tem uma regra: tudo o que estiver fora das diretrizes vai ser exposto num telão, em praça pública. E aqui vão as diretrizes: nada de conteúdo sexual explícito ou íntimo, nada de nudez ou fotos comprometedoras, nada de conversas privadas que, fora de contexto, possam ser mal interpretadas. Ou seja… qualquer coisa que você normalmente mantém em segredo, só pra você. Agora pensa: o que você faz quando ninguém está vendo? Porque é exatamente isso que vai aparecer. E você só pode apagar UMA coisa antes de entregar. 1. Suas conversas no WhatsApp Conversas íntimas, inclusive de cunho sexual… fofocas, gente falando mal de colega de trabalho, vizinho, chefe, parente… qualquer assunto que você não deveria falar nem para o seu melhor amigo. Coisas que ali fazem sentido, mas num telão ganham outro peso. 2. Sua galeria de fotos Fotos sensuais, nudez ou qualquer registro que nunca foi feito pra ser público. 3. Seu histórico do ChatGPT Conversas que você teve quando estava sozinho… coisas que você teria vergonha de falar até pras paredes. Perguntas mirabolantes, ideias esquisitas, curiosidades duvidosas… e talvez versões suas que ninguém nunca imaginou que existiam. Porque no fim… não é sobre o que é proibido. É sobre o que você não quer que os outros nunca saibam. No meu caso: WhatsApp passava no verde, tranquilo, sem crise. Galeria ficava no amarelo, tem umas fotos ali que mereciam um certo sigilo. Mas o vermelho, sem pensar duas vezes, é o histórico do ChatGPT. Porque lá tem coisa que até Deus duvida. Prefiro nem comentar. submitted by /u/Mysterious_Engine_7 [link] [comments]

I asked ChatGPT and Gemini to generate a world map

submitted by /u/Pitiful-Entrance5769 [link] [comments]